This guy should sue, too.
29-Jul-10
New Scientist:
Climategate scientist breaks his silence
With inquiries into the affair now complete, Phil Jones reflects on his bruising experiences at the centre of the storm…
Some of your critics say the emails revealed distortions of peer review. In one, for instance, you wrote about keeping papers out of the IPCC report “even if we have to redefine peer review literature”.
PJ Muir Russell showed that to be wrong. He found there was no perversion of the peer-review process. The papers that we were referring to in that email were bad science. One was involved in a long saga in which half the editorial board of the journal that published it resigned.
Also in New Scientist:
Editorial: End dirty tactics in the climate war
Dream on, scientists. The dirty tactics won’t stop until they no longer work. And that depends on us.
Post a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.