<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media &amp; Politics (only one section today)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://makethemaccountable.com/index.php/2008/05/10/media-080510/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://makethemaccountable.com/index.php/2008/05/10/media-080510/</link>
	<description>Making politicians and media accountable to ordinary citizens since 2000.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 21:22:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dlkincaid</title>
		<link>http://makethemaccountable.com/index.php/2008/05/10/media-080510/comment-page-1/#comment-811009</link>
		<dc:creator>dlkincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 22:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://makethemaccountable.com/index.php/2008/05/10/media-080510/#comment-811009</guid>
		<description>As a Black female - Obama doesn&#039;t need my vote and McCain doesn&#039;t deserve it, so being 62 years old and Health Care challenged - I&#039;ll probably make the transition without ever VOTING AGAIN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Black female &#8211; Obama doesn&#8217;t need my vote and McCain doesn&#8217;t deserve it, so being 62 years old and Health Care challenged &#8211; I&#8217;ll probably make the transition without ever VOTING AGAIN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole...</title>
		<link>http://makethemaccountable.com/index.php/2008/05/10/media-080510/comment-page-1/#comment-810754</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 03:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://makethemaccountable.com/index.php/2008/05/10/media-080510/#comment-810754</guid>
		<description>First &quot;viable&#039; woman candidate? 
My dictonary defines viable as being alive and capable of thriving. Would that not be applied to all candidates for all offices? Would that not apply to, perhaps Liz Dole--a candidate past, of a party I wish had passed?

My personal preference is not for a candidate, male or female who is touting their &#039;war ready&#039; credentials--like a 3 am phone call and that proves a candidate is ready on day one, because a &#039;bomb who list&#039; is at the bedside, like touting being a gun fan from early childhood, learned to shoot and killed a duck.

My personal preference, for pRes anyway, is for someone who recognizes that the vote to give a sociapathic guy the path to starting an aggressive war based on lies and deception is
---at least---wrong. Failure to recognize that is tantamount to admiting a like of war, a like of obliterating, a like of death and distruction.

How many women, or men for that matter, would gladly jump into the Bundy V.W. knowing that he was a sociapathic killer and that by doing so their life expectancy dropped to zero? How many would thing he was &#039;charming&#039;?

How many would do  a &#039;Nader&#039; circe 2000 on a rival so they could perhaps benefit from the fallout?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First &#8220;viable&#8217; woman candidate?<br />
My dictonary defines viable as being alive and capable of thriving. Would that not be applied to all candidates for all offices? Would that not apply to, perhaps Liz Dole&#8211;a candidate past, of a party I wish had passed?</p>
<p>My personal preference is not for a candidate, male or female who is touting their &#8216;war ready&#8217; credentials&#8211;like a 3 am phone call and that proves a candidate is ready on day one, because a &#8216;bomb who list&#8217; is at the bedside, like touting being a gun fan from early childhood, learned to shoot and killed a duck.</p>
<p>My personal preference, for pRes anyway, is for someone who recognizes that the vote to give a sociapathic guy the path to starting an aggressive war based on lies and deception is<br />
&#8212;at least&#8212;wrong. Failure to recognize that is tantamount to admiting a like of war, a like of obliterating, a like of death and distruction.</p>
<p>How many women, or men for that matter, would gladly jump into the Bundy V.W. knowing that he was a sociapathic killer and that by doing so their life expectancy dropped to zero? How many would thing he was &#8216;charming&#8217;?</p>
<p>How many would do  a &#8216;Nader&#8217; circe 2000 on a rival so they could perhaps benefit from the fallout?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

