Permanent link to MTA daily media news
‘Politics of unity’ won, Obama team says
“This was a great repudiation of the politics of divisiveness and an affirmation of the politics of unity,” David Axelrod, the top political strategist in Sen. Barack Obama’s presidential campaign, just told USA TODAY’s Fredreka Schouten. He was talking, of course, about Obama’s win in today’s South Carolina Democratic presidential primary.
Keep on believing. Believe in belief. Hope for hope.
Unity isn’t all it’s cracked up to be (by Ezra Klein, writing at the Los Angeles Times)
[H]earing all these presidential hopefuls pledge to end gridlock is a bit like having a friend promise to fix my toilet by checking under the hood of my car… There are a variety of fixes for a filibuster-happy minority. The media, for example, could start accurately reporting the cause of the gridlock, shaming the relevant senators and increasing political pressure to compromise. The voters could eject politicians who refuse to compromise, laying down an electorally enforced preference for a functioning government. The Senate majority could change the rules, essentially eliminating the filibuster. Groups such as Unity ’08 could arise and, rather than wasting everyone’s time with idle fantasies of ever more dreamy executives, could campaign against Senate rules that are undemocratic and hostile to progress. But the president can’t do this, not on his or her own. Unity means nothing in the face of obstructionism, and problems can’t be solved if legislators refuse to solve them.
Winning Large (by digby)
So, this ugly race is over and it looks like all the racial talk was overblown and overplayed. The voters, once again, made their voices heard and the politicians will have to heed them. I would hope that the media will take a little breather as well. Watching the concern trolling about Democratic racial divisiveness among people like Peggy Noonan, Joe Scarborough and Bill Bennett is enough to make me sick and should give progressives pause. As I wrote last night, I don’t think this helps Senator Obama any more than it helps Clinton.
Yes, well, good luck with that, Digby! The media love to hate the Clintons, and they love to be in love with somebody else.
Craig Crawford: “[T]he evidence-free bias against the Clintons in the media borders on mental illness” (Media Matters)
Summary: On Morning Joe, Craig Crawford stated: “I really think the evidence-free bias against the Clintons in the media borders on mental illness.” Crawford went on to assert, “I mean, we’ve gotten into a situation where if you try to be fair to the Clintons, if you try to be objective, if you try to say, ‘Well, where’s the evidence of racism in the Clinton campaign?’ you’re accused of being a naïve shill for the Clintons.” He later added: “I really think it’s a problem.”
Is Mary Katherine Ham serious? (by John Amato at Crooks and Liars)
I’m not sure how the Reliable Sources crew let this ignorant statement by Mary Katharine Ham, blogger and managing editor of townhall.com get by. “HAM: Well, I think Clinton has a duality. You know, he’s the charming guy, he’s the nice guy, but he’s also a guy who’s prone to eruptions and some falsehoods… When he was president, he was not subjected to quite as much scrutiny, and I think he got a lot of passes, and now he’s mad he’s not getting them anymore. Was she even a little bit conscious during his presidency? Apparently not.
Click through to watch the video.
Lessons of 1992 (by Paul Krugman)
[T]hose who don’t want to nominate Hillary Clinton because they don’t want to return to the nastiness of the 1990s — a sizable group, at least in the punditocracy — are deluding themselves. Any Democrat who makes it to the White House can expect the same treatment: an unending procession of wild charges and fake scandals, dutifully given credence by major media organizations that somehow can’t bring themselves to declare the accusations unequivocally false (at least not on Page 1). The point is that while there are valid reasons one might support Mr. Obama over Mrs. Clinton, the desire to avoid unpleasantness isn’t one of them.
OBAMA vs. CLINTON…. (by Kevin Drum at Political Animal, the Washington Monthly)
Reader MDS thinks I’m overreacting: “Please, I beg you, reconsider. You were the only blogger making any sense on the Obama/Clinton front, and now you’ve jumped ship, too? Trust me, I live in Chicago, I’ve met Obama, I voted for him for Senate, I think he’s great … but he’s just not up to running for president. Yes, the Clinton campaign said some stupid stuff. But no matter how much that turns you against Hillary, the way the Obama campaign has cried about it should turn you even more against Obama. Having watched him up close, I can tell you, Obama is an inspirational guy who doesn’t have a clue how to campaign. If it’s Obama vs. McCain, we’re in for six months of Swift Boating followed by four more years of a Republican in the White House.”
I think this business about Obama being a political naïf is pretty naïve. His only political experience has been in Chicago, and his chief strategist is also Mayor Daley’s chief political advisor.
Worrying about Obama (by Dan Payne, writing in the Boston Globe)
BARACK OBAMA has a realistic chance to be the Democratic nominee for president. As the only white employee at a Detroit civil rights organization years ago, I am moved by this remarkable moment in our nation’s history. But as a media consultant to Democrats, I am worried. I want to know more about Obama. And I want to know it now, not in the fall when the Republicans and their thugs in “independent” groups start slinging the sludge.
Critics: Obama endorsements counter calls for clean government (Chicago Tribune)
There was little controversy earlier this year when Sen. Barack Obama endorsed Mayor Richard Daley over two black opponents for a sixth term, lending his star power to an inevitable rout. But Obama’s record of local endorsements — one measure of how he has used his nascent political clout — has drawn criticism from those who say it reflects his deference to Chicago’s established political order and runs counter to his public calls for clean government.
OBAMA AND THE PRESS…. (by Kevin Drum at Political Animal, the Washington Monthly)
[Howard Kurtz:] “…Some reporters say Obama seems disdainful toward journalists…” Obama has gotten pretty rapturous press coverage anyway, and Kurtz mentions later in his piece that reporters are just as susceptible to the famous Obama charisma as anyone. Still, the general election is going to be a slugfest, and it’s a bad sign if Obama’s press operation hasn’t been honed to deal with it. What’s more, it’s also peculiar: why stay aloof from a press corps that loves you? Maybe someone should try to ask him.
Obama Backers Drop Hints About Edwards (Political Wire)
“Illinois Democrats close to Sen. Barack Obama are quietly passing the word that John Edwards will be named attorney general in an Obama administration,” according to Robert Novak. The appointment of Edwards “would please not only the union leaders supporting him for president but organized labor in general. The unions relish the prospect of an unequivocal labor partisan as the nation’s top legal officer.”
Why would the Obama campaign give this scoop, if it’s true, to Robert Novak, and not to Lynn Sweet?
Huckabee: Iraq Probably Had WMD, But ‘I Don’t Have Any Evidence’ (Think Progress)
[O]n Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace pressed Huckabee to offer evidence to support [his claim that Iraq had WMD]. “Governor, the Iraq Survey Group looked around Iraq for months after the invasion,” Wallace noted, and “could find no evidence that Saddam Hussein had an active program…Do you have any evidence of that contention?” Huckabee answered: “I don’t have any evidence… But simply saying — we didn’t find them so therefore they didn’t exist — is a bit of an overreach.”
We don’t need no stinking evidence! Click through to watch the video.
H&C: The Politics of Sex (by Nicole Belle at Crooks and Liars)
It appears that Playboy Magazine commissioned a study from FOXNews’ favorite wordsmith… Luntz claimed that Democrats were more sexually adventurous, but after hearing about Craig, Vitter, Foley, Haggard and other Republican sex scandals, I’m struggling to figure out how Democrats could be. Bathrooms, e-sex, hookers & diapers, hookers and massages. I mean, where do you go from there?
Not to mention toe sucking. Click through to watch the video.
Why Would Presidents Envy Bad Growth? (by Dean Baker)
The NYT had a piece [Sunday] on President Bush’s economic legacy. In the second sentence it tells readers that: “Mr. Bush has spent years presiding over an economic climate of growth that would be the envy of most presidents…” [But although] Bush’s growth record is better than his father’s, but it is worse than the record of every other president in the last half century. It’s not clear why they would be envious. It is also not clear what his political advisers have to complain about.
Click through for the numbers.
If You Mess Up, Be Sure to Do It In a Really Big Way (by Dean Baker)
Great piece in the NYT showing how the bosses who led Citigroup and Merrill Lynch to losses in the tens of billions of dollars are being courted for top jobs at other firms. However employment prospects are not nearly so promising for those lower down the rung, who lost their jobs due to cost-cutting.
Mythbuster: DISPELLING CONFUSION ON FOOD STAMPS, TAX REBATES, AND THE STIMULUS PACKAGE (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities)
If one of the goals of the stimulus package is to act quickly to avert a serious recession, then provisions that are both effective and fast acting ought be accorded some priority. For these reasons, Goldman Sachs counseled on Friday that the food stamp and UI provisions have “strong policy justifications.” In addition, an analysis issued last week by Moody’s Economy.com finds that the food stamp and UI proposals would be the two most cost-effective of all stimulus options — that is, these are the measures that would produce the largest increases in economic activity per dollar of cost.
No more food stamps. You’ve eaten enough (by Andrew Leonard, Salon)
The attraction of food stamps is that … increasing their value doesn’t require goosing cumbersome IRS machinery into motion… So what’s not to like? Well, aside from Republican reluctance to boost any kind of government spending aimed at making a tangible difference in the public welfare, there is also the assertion, reiterated Friday morning by the consistently interesting and provocative Megan McArdle, whose libertarian-oriented blog is hosted at the Atlantic, that poor fat people shouldn’t be encouraged to buy more food.
Leonard goes on to explain that the obesity problem is more a result of our government’s subsidy of high-calorie, low-nutrition foods than anything else. But we can always trust right wingers to come up with creative ways to blame the victim.
Media Matters for America headlines
Scarborough: Clinton campaign is “at war against African-Americans, and now they are at war against the Democratic Party”
MSNBC’s Scarborough falsely suggested Clinton congratulated Obama only by “paper statement”
NY Times’ Rich misrepresented Russert’s misleading archives question
Buchanan equated purported rift in minority voters to “war[s]” in South Central L.A., prisons
AT&T’s proposed filtering policy is bad news
AT&T’s CEO this week outlined the company’s proposed plans to monitor traffic over its online network. He failed to mention that such a plan is also unethical, impractical and insane.
It’s net un-neutrality on the consumer side, instead of the provider side.
Copyright Now Extends To Cease-And-Desist Letters? (by Sean P. Aune at Mashable)
TechDirt is reporting an update to a case they first covered back in October where a lawyer tried to claim his cease-and-desist letters fell under a copyright, and thus no one could legally reprint them without his express permission… [F]rom the look of a press release put out yesterday by the lawyer in question, it seems the judge agreed the man’s claim. The publication of a letter can now result statutory damages for as much as $150,000 per occurrence plus attorneys’ fees that can average $750,000 through trial.
Scientology Writes; Gawker Rises
At Scientology’s request, several Web sites took down a video of Tom Cruise talking passionately about the church, but Gawker isn’t budging.
Leahy And Cornyn: White House Trying To ‘Eliminate’ FOIA Office (Think Progress)
On New Years Eve, facing “congressional pushback against the Bush administration’s movement to greater secrecy,” President Bush signed the OPEN Government Act, toughening the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The legislation — unanimously passed by the House and Senate — would push agencies to respond more quickly to records requests. But now, the White House is doing everything it can to neuter the law.
Washington Post Starts an Online Magazine for Blacks
Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. will be editor in chief of the online magazine, called The Root.
Hedge Fund’s Letter Explains Intentions Regarding The Times
Firebrand Partners said it would not seek to change the The New York Times Company’s ownership structure, but wanted the company to sell some assets and focus on digital publishing.
Direct-to-DVD Releases Shed Their Loser Label
Once a dumping ground for movies considered virtually unwatchable, the direct-to-DVD pipeline is becoming increasingly important to mainstream film franchises.
“Beavis” goes portable on PlayStation format
LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) – The Universal Media Disc, a proprietary format for Sony’s PlayStation Portable, may have failed as a movie format, but Sony’s continued attempts to portray the PSP as a multimedia device rather than a game player now find the company trying again, this time with TV shows.
Startups Rush to Pave Way for Web Video
NEW YORK (AP) – Video on the Internet has gone from being the next big thing to the current big thing. But murky YouTube videos are just the start – there’s a lot of room for improvement. A raft of startups are rushing to supply the tools to make better and more profitable video available.
Qtrax Aims to Offer IPod-Friendly Tracks
LOS ANGELES (AP) – A revamped online file-sharing service that promised to offer unlimited, free music downloads from all the major record labels hit an apparent snag Sunday after one denied it had given the service permission.
Sony Ericsson cuts deals with 10 music labels
STOCKHOLM (Reuters) – Mobile phone maker Sony Ericsson said it had signed deals with 10 music labels to add content to its PlayNow service, which lets users download music via their mobile phones.
BlackBerry Servers Gain New User and Administrator Features
R.I.M. has released a new version of its BlackBerry Enterprise Server, along with a new social-networking client that ties BlackBerry into a growing array of collaboration applications.
Mobile Advertising Set To Go Big This Year? (by Sean P. Aune at Mashable)
Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, the Google [CEO Eric Schmidt] went against the predictions that mobile ads wouldn’t hit $1 billion in revenue until 2012. Reuters reported Schmidt as saying, “It’s the recreation of the Internet, it’s the recreation of the PC story, and it is before us — and it is very likely it will happen in the next year.”